S515 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 501
The affidavit filed in support of the application disclosed no basis upon which any relief should be granted, so an order nisi was refused. Given the applicant's earlier judicial review application, failure to appear, dismissed proceeding, purported appeal, and failure to appear on that appeal, it was appropriate to make the Minister's requested costs and filing restriction orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order Nisi Seeking Prerogative Relief in Respect of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application for an order nisi refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'prerogative Relief' 'order Nisi' 'dismissal for Want of Appearance' 'filing Restriction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order Nisi Seeking Prerogative Relief in Respect of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's affidavit disclosed a basis upon which prerogative relief should be granted in respect of the Tribunal's decision of 5 March 2002." "Whether costs and an order restricting further applications for review of the Tribunal's decision should be made."]
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit filed in support of the application disclosed no basis upon which any relief should be granted, so an order nisi was refused. Given the applicant's earlier judicial review application, failure to appear, dismissed proceeding, purported appeal, and failure to appear on that appeal, it was appropriate to make the Minister's requested costs and filing restriction orders.
Court Disposition
Application for an order nisi refused.
Orders
- ['The application for an order nisi be refused.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs." "No application for review of the Tribunal's decision of 5 March 2002 be accepted for filing in this Court without the leave of the Court."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment