S515 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 673
As the applicant's affidavit did not disclose any basis for relief and the applicant repeatedly failed to appear in proceedings, the application for an order nisi was refused, and further applications for review are not to be accepted without leave of the Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / On Remittal From the High Court
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'tribunal Decisions' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / On Remittal From the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant demonstrated a basis for constitutional writ relief in respect of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision of 5 March 2002" 'Whether a further application for review should be permitted']
Ratio Decidendi
As the applicant's affidavit did not disclose any basis for relief and the applicant repeatedly failed to appear in proceedings, the application for an order nisi was refused, and further applications for review are not to be accepted without leave of the Court.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- ['Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.' 'The application for an order nisi be refused.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs." "No application for review of the Tribunal's decision on 5 March 2002 be accepted for filing in this Court without the leave of the Court."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment