Pauls v R [2024] NSWCCA 123
The sentencing judge erred by failing to make findings about remorse, likelihood of reoffending, and prospects of rehabilitation despite competing submissions and evidence on these matters. However, upon re-sentencing, no lesser sentence than that imposed was warranted given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals Against Sentence' 'mitigating Factors' 'sentencing' 'failure to Make Findings' 'adequacy of Reasons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether sentencing judge failed to make findings regarding mitigating factors (remorse, likelihood of reoffending, prospects of rehabilitation) under s 21A(3) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)' 'whether reasons were inadequate' 'whether lesser sentence warranted']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by failing to make findings about remorse, likelihood of reoffending, and prospects of rehabilitation despite competing submissions and evidence on these matters. However, upon re-sentencing, no lesser sentence than that imposed was warranted given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Extension of time to file application for leave to appeal to 24 May 2024 granted' 'Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment