Sabharwal v Lane Cove Council [2023] NSWLEC 1022
The Court held that, although weight should be given to the DCP provision prohibiting roof terraces and decks above the upper storey, the amended proposal provided a reasonable alternative solution that achieved the applicable amenity objectives. The rooftop terrace and lift were permissible with consent as part of a dwelling house in the R2 zone, satisfied the relevant aims and objectives of the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009, and, with the amended design and consent conditions, would not cause unreasonable acoustic or visual privacy impacts, unacceptable bulk and scale, streetscape impacts or overshadowing. The DCP prohibition was therefore applied flexibly under s 4.15(3A),...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against a Deferred Commencement Condition Imposed on Development Consent for Development Application Da48/2022 / Principal Judgment After Conciliation Was Terminated and Hearing Held
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application DA48/2022 determined by grant of consent subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deferred Commencement Condition' 'rooftop Terrace With Lift Access' 'development Control Plan Flexibility' 'acoustic Privacy' 'visual Privacy' 'residential Amenity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against a Deferred Commencement Condition Imposed on Development Consent for Development Application Da48/2022 / Principal Judgment After Conciliation Was Terminated and Hearing Held
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether deferred commencement condition M1 requiring deletion of the rooftop terrace and redundant portion of the lift should be removed.' 'Whether the proposed rooftop terrace above the upper storey should be treated as prohibited by Part C, section 1.8.2 of the Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2010 or applied flexibly under s 4.15(3A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the amended rooftop terrace and lift would cause unacceptable acoustic or visual privacy impacts to adjoining properties, particularly 21 Upper Cliff Road and 17 Upper Cliff Road.' 'Whether the amended screening would create unacceptable bulk and scale or excessive wall height.' 'Whether Development Application DA48/2022, as amended, should be granted consent subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, although weight should be given to the DCP provision prohibiting roof terraces and decks above the upper storey, the amended proposal provided a reasonable alternative solution that achieved the applicable amenity objectives. The rooftop terrace and lift were permissible with consent as part of a dwelling house in the R2 zone, satisfied the relevant aims and objectives of the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009, and, with the amended design and consent conditions, would not cause unreasonable acoustic or visual privacy impacts, unacceptable bulk and scale, streetscape impacts or overshadowing. The DCP prohibition was therefore applied flexibly under s 4.15(3A),...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application DA48/2022 determined by grant of consent subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to rely on plans described in condition A.1 of Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application DA48/2022 which seeks a rooftop terrace with lift access on Lot 6 in Deposited Plan 6768, also known as 19 Upper Cliff Road, Northwood is determined by the grant of consent, subject to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment