RAAD v R [2011] NSWCCA 138
The sentence imposed at first instance was quashed due to significant errors in law: reliance on sentencing statistics to establish a starting point and inadequate allowance for the Ellis factors. A new sentence comprising a total term of 12 years, with a non-parole period of 9 years, was substituted, reflecting the appropriate leniency for voluntary disclosure and circumstances of the offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Re Sentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; leave granted; sentence quashed; new sentence imposed with revised non-parole period.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'felony Murder' 'armed Robbery' 'voluntary Disclosure' 'special Circumstances' 'leniency' 'parole Eligibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Re Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether insufficient weight was given to applicant's voluntary disclosure of guilt" 'Whether there were special circumstances warranting variation of the statutory ratio between the overall sentence and parole period' "Appropriateness of the sentencing judge's reliance on sentencing statistics" 'Adequacy of discount for Ellis factors']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed at first instance was quashed due to significant errors in law: reliance on sentencing statistics to establish a starting point and inadequate allowance for the Ellis factors. A new sentence comprising a total term of 12 years, with a non-parole period of 9 years, was substituted, reflecting the appropriate leniency for voluntary disclosure and circumstances of the offence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; leave granted; sentence quashed; new sentence imposed with revised non-parole period.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Allow the appeal and quash the sentence imposed at first instance.' 'Substitute a sentence comprising a non-parole period of 9 years commencing on 7 February 2008 and expiring on 6 February 2017 and a balance of term of 3 years expiring on 6 February 2020.' 'Applicant eligible for parole...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment