Saffron Sun Pty Ltd v Perma-Fit Finance Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1152
The plaintiff was entitled to specific performance because it established it was ready, willing and able to perform the contract, the defendant did not attend or oppose, and no defence was substantiated except the assertion that the contract was 'uncommercial', which did not preclude enforcement.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Saffron Sun Pty Ltd; Defendant: Perma-Fit Finance Pty Ltd (Admin Appointed)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Specific Performance of Sale of Land / Hearing of Claim for Specific Performance; Claim for Damages Stood Over
- Outcome
- Specific performance granted.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Sale of Land, Enforcement by Purchaser
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saffron Sun Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Perma-Fit Finance Pty Ltd (Admin Appointed)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Specific Performance of Sale of Land / Hearing of Claim for Specific Performance; Claim for Damages Stood Over
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the contract for sale of land
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was entitled to specific performance because it established it was ready, willing and able to perform the contract, the defendant did not attend or oppose, and no defence was substantiated except the assertion that the contract was 'uncommercial', which did not preclude enforcement.
Court Disposition
Specific performance granted.
Orders
- Specific performance of the contract for sale of land granted in favour of the plaintiff as per the draft orders laid before the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment