Saffron v The Queen [1953] HCA 51
The Court of Criminal Appeal's determination of the reserved question under s. 5A (2) was not appealable because it did not affect the applicant's acquittal, rights or liabilities, and operated at most as a judicial precedent rather than as a judgment, decree, order or sentence within s. 73 of the Constitution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Matter / Application for Special Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['appealability of Advisory Opinions' 'reserved Questions of Law After Acquittal' 'section 73 of the Constitution' 'admissibility of Evidence Given Before a Royal Commission']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Matter / Application for Special Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the determination of a reserved question by the Court of Criminal Appeal under s. 5A (2) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912-1951 N.S.W. after an acquittal was a judgment, decree, order or sentence appealable under s. 73 of the Constitution.' "Whether the applicant's rights or liabilities were affected by the Court of Criminal Appeal's determination that evidence given before the Royal Commission was admissible or not rendered inadmissible by specified matters."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Criminal Appeal's determination of the reserved question under s. 5A (2) was not appealable because it did not affect the applicant's acquittal, rights or liabilities, and operated at most as a judicial precedent rather than as a judgment, decree, order or sentence within s. 73 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- ['Special leave to appeal refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment