Safwat Beshara v Australian Postal Corporation; Australian Postal Corporation v Swan Services Pty Ltd; Swan Services Pty Ltd v The Underwriter Insurance Company Pty Ltd; Australian Postal Corporation v The Underwriter Insurance Company Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDC 71
The matter should proceed as if the amendments sought by the cross-defendant were allowed and no amendments to the pleadings by the defendant have been made or allowed, given that s 151Z may operate independently but notice to the plaintiff remains important.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application on Amendments to Pleadings
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'notice' 's 151 Z of Workers Compensation Act' 'contribution and Indemnity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application on Amendments to Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 151Z of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 must be specifically pleaded to be relied upon' 'Whether sufficient notice has been given to the plaintiff regarding reliance on s 151Z' 'Whether late amendments to pleadings should be allowed']
Ratio Decidendi
The matter should proceed as if the amendments sought by the cross-defendant were allowed and no amendments to the pleadings by the defendant have been made or allowed, given that s 151Z may operate independently but notice to the plaintiff remains important.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- ['Matter to proceed as if the amendments sought by the cross-defendant were allowed and no amendments to the pleadings by the defendant have been made or allowed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment