REGINA v. AKBARY [2001] NSWCCA 491

REGINA v. AKBARY [2001] NSWCCA 491

The trial judge appropriately considered mental illness and circumstances of the offending; no error is established warranting interference. The sentence imposed was as lenient as was consistent with binding authority.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Appellant: Said Najibullayh Akbary
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 November 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Sentence, Armed Robbery, Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor, Rehabilitation in Custody, General and Special Deterrence
Criminal Law Appeal Against Sentence Armed Robbery Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor Rehabilitation in Custody General and Special Deterrence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Said Najibullayh Akbary

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in sentencing by not giving sufficient mitigation for mental illness and influence of drugs/alcohol.
  2. 2 Whether error was made in assessing the circumstances of imprisonment and rehabilitation.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge appropriately considered mental illness and circumstances of the offending; no error is established warranting interference. The sentence imposed was as lenient as was consistent with binding authority.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
  • Appeal dismissed.