R v Carberry (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 166

R v Carberry (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 166

The 2016 and 2017 incidents, taken together, were capable of establishing the asserted tendency that the deceased became violent when his goals were frustrated. That tendency could significantly affect the jury's assessment of central facts in issue, including who initiated the violence and whether the accused acted in self-defence. The passage of time and family context did not deprive the evidence of significant probative value. The notice requirements were dispensed with under s 100(1), and the evidence was admissible under s 97 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial for Alleged Murder / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Tendency Evidence During Trial
Outcome
Tendency evidence admissible.
Legal Topics
['tendency Evidence' 'significant Probative Value' 'self Defence' 'prior Violent Acts by Deceased' 'dispensing With Notice Requirements']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['tendency Evidence' 'significant Probative Value' 'self Defence' 'prior Violent Acts by Deceased' 'dispensing With Notice Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial for Alleged Murder / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Tendency Evidence During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should dispense with the notice requirements for tendency evidence under s 97 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' "Whether evidence of the deceased's prior violent conduct had significant probative value under s 97 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)." 'Whether the prior incidents were capable of supporting the asserted tendency that the deceased was violent when his goals were frustrated.' "Whether the evidence was admissible in the context of the accused's self-defence case."]

Ratio Decidendi

The 2016 and 2017 incidents, taken together, were capable of establishing the asserted tendency that the deceased became violent when his goals were frustrated. That tendency could significantly affect the jury's assessment of central facts in issue, including who initiated the violence and whether the accused acted in self-defence. The passage of time and family context did not deprive the evidence of significant probative value. The notice requirements were dispensed with under s 100(1), and the evidence was admissible under s 97 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Tendency evidence admissible.

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to s 100(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), the notice requirements were dispensed with.' 'The tendency evidence to be adduced is admissible.']