Salcap Property Holdings Pty Ltd v JSquared Projects Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATCD 45
The builder, as contractor under the original building contract, is liable to the successor in title for breach of statutory warranties under s 18B and s 18D of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), irrespective of who physically performed the work. The majority of the alleged defects were established as 'major defects', and therefore within time for rectification orders. The evidence supported work orders (not a money order) as the appropriate remedy given no compelling reason to displace the statutory preference. Orders were made requiring the builder to carry out specified rectification works.
- Parties
- Applicant: Salcap Property Holdings Pty Ltd; Respondent: JSquared Projects Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Building Dispute / Statutory Warranties / Final Determination and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made: application substantially dismissed except for rectification work ordered; question of costs reserved for further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Home Building Act 1989 (nsw), Statutory Warranties, Defective Building Work, Work Orders, Successor in Title, Major Defects, Tribunal Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salcap Property Holdings Pty Ltd
Applicant
JSquared Projects Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Building Dispute / Statutory Warranties / Final Determination and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the builder is liable for statutory warranties to a successor in title under s 18B and s 18D of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the claimed defects are 'major defects' and thus within time for relief
- 3 Identification and rectification of defective works: waterproofing, external walls, balconies, wet areas, mould remediation, floor framing
Ratio Decidendi
The builder, as contractor under the original building contract, is liable to the successor in title for breach of statutory warranties under s 18B and s 18D of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), irrespective of who physically performed the work. The majority of the alleged defects were established as 'major defects', and therefore within time for rectification orders. The evidence supported work orders (not a money order) as the appropriate remedy given no compelling reason to displace the statutory preference. Orders were made requiring the builder to carry out specified rectification works.
Court Disposition
Orders made: application substantially dismissed except for rectification work ordered; question of costs reserved for further submissions.
Orders
- Within 14 weeks the respondent is to carry out the works specified in the attached Schedule in a proper and workmanlike manner.
- The application is otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment