Knowledge Business Accelerator Limited & Anor v Marianne Gregorienna Reiner & Anor [2003] NSWSC 435
The handwritten note signed on 8 April 2002 evidenced an immediately binding contract for the First Plaintiff to sell its shares in Mortgage Genius Pty Ltd and Investment Genius Pty Ltd to Mrs Reiner or her nominee for $50,000 payable on 29 June 2002. The Court rejected the evidence that the agreement was subject to formal legal documentation or further essential terms, found no breach, repudiation, or unclean hands by Mr Iskander, and held that the Plaintiffs were ready, willing and able to complete and were entitled to specific performance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Commercial List Proceedings Seeking a Declaration and Specific Performance of a Share Sale Agreement / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs entitled to an order for specific performance.
- Legal Topics
- ['sale of Shares' 'specific Performance' 'intention to Create Binding Agreement' 'formal Contract Contemplated' 'repudiation' 'unclean Hands']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Commercial List Proceedings Seeking a Declaration and Specific Performance of a Share Sale Agreement / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the handwritten note signed on 8 April 2002 constituted a binding agreement for the sale of shares notwithstanding the expectation of a formal document.' 'Whether the Second Plaintiff breached or repudiated the agreement.' 'Whether the Plaintiffs were disentitled to relief by reason of unclean hands.' 'Whether the Plaintiffs were entitled to an order for specific performance.']
Ratio Decidendi
The handwritten note signed on 8 April 2002 evidenced an immediately binding contract for the First Plaintiff to sell its shares in Mortgage Genius Pty Ltd and Investment Genius Pty Ltd to Mrs Reiner or her nominee for $50,000 payable on 29 June 2002. The Court rejected the evidence that the agreement was subject to formal legal documentation or further essential terms, found no breach, repudiation, or unclean hands by Mr Iskander, and held that the Plaintiffs were ready, willing and able to complete and were entitled to specific performance.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs entitled to an order for specific performance.
Orders
- ['The appropriate declaration and orders should be in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Summons.' 'Plaintiffs directed to bring in short minutes of orders.' 'Parties may address the Court in relation to costs.' 'Arrangements to be made with the Associate by 2 June 2003 for relisting of the matter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment