Davis v Davis [2014] NSWSC 234

Davis v Davis [2014] NSWSC 234

Because Sally Davis was an eligible person for whom the will had not made adequate provision, and because her income, rental expenses, lack of earning capacity, age and medical conditions created a continuing financial shortfall, the Court considered that a lump sum of $220,000 was necessary and sufficient to provide adequate maintenance and advancement in life. In fixing that amount the Court also gave weight to the modest size of the estate, both daughters' limited resources and similar ages, and Alison Anne Davis' substantial long-term care of Mrs Davis and contributions to the property.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application Under Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Principal Judgment Determining Nature and Quantum of Provision
Outcome
Family provision order made in favour of the plaintiff for a lump sum legacy of $220,000 in addition to the provision made by clause 5 of the will, with both parties' costs payable out of the estate on specified bases.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'adequate Provision for Proper Maintenance or Advancement in Life' 'quantum of Provision' 'costs Out of Estate']
['succession' 'equity'] ['family Provision' 'adequate Provision for Proper Maintenance or Advancement in Life' 'quantum of Provision' 'costs Out of Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application Under Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Principal Judgment Determining Nature and Quantum of Provision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What nature and quantum of family provision order should be made for Sally Davis out of her mother's estate." "Whether a lump sum provision was appropriate having regard to the parties' circumstances, the estate size, Sally Davis' financial needs and Alison Anne Davis' contributions and needs."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because Sally Davis was an eligible person for whom the will had not made adequate provision, and because her income, rental expenses, lack of earning capacity, age and medical conditions created a continuing financial shortfall, the Court considered that a lump sum of $220,000 was necessary and sufficient to provide adequate maintenance and advancement in life. In fixing that amount the Court also gave weight to the modest size of the estate, both daughters' limited resources and similar ages, and Alison Anne Davis' substantial long-term care of Mrs Davis and contributions to the property.

Court Disposition

Family provision order made in favour of the plaintiff for a lump sum legacy of $220,000 in addition to the provision made by clause 5 of the will, with both parties' costs payable out of the estate on specified bases.

Orders

  • ['Sally Davis is to receive a lump sum legacy in the amount of $220,000 in addition to the provision made for her by clause 5 of the will.' "Sally Davis' costs on the ordinary basis are to be paid out of the estate." "Alison Anne Davis' costs on an indemnity basis are to be paid out of the estate." 'The parties were...