Sally Jane Wilson and Kevrob [1995] IRCA 706

Sally Jane Wilson and Kevrob [1995] IRCA 706

The Court found that the applicant was unlawfully terminated as the employer failed to provide a valid reason for termination and concealed the true position regarding her ongoing employment. The evidence supported that she did not resign, and the employer breached section 170DE of the Industrial Relations Act. Reinstatement being impracticable, maximum compensation was appropriate.

Parties
Applicant: Sally Jane Wilson; Respondent: Kevrob
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 1995
Procedural Posture
Application for Compensation for Unlawful Termination / Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed; compensation awarded to applicant
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Compensation, Employment Law
Industrial Law Unlawful Termination Compensation Employment Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sally Jane Wilson

Applicant

Kevrob

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Compensation for Unlawful Termination / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was unlawfully terminated from her employment
  2. 2 Whether the applicant resigned or was dismissed
  3. 3 Whether compensation is payable under the Industrial Relations Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant was unlawfully terminated as the employer failed to provide a valid reason for termination and concealed the true position regarding her ongoing employment. The evidence supported that she did not resign, and the employer breached section 170DE of the Industrial Relations Act. Reinstatement being impracticable, maximum compensation was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; compensation awarded to applicant

Orders

  • The respondent is to pay to the applicant the sum of $13,780.00 within 28 days of the date of this judgment.
  • The respondent is to pay to the applicant the further sum of $530.00 under section 170EE(5) within 28 days of the date of this judgment.