Barbagallo v Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 699
The Court found that in May or June 2001 Mr Barbagallo and the other four directors made an enforceable agreement that, if Mr Barbagallo resigned and ceased taking part in management, they would purchase his 25 percent shareholding at fair market value assessed as at 30 June 2001 using the method employed by Mr Bevan for Mr Wehby's earlier sale. The term "fair market value" was sufficiently certain and could be determined by the Court. Article 4(1) did not defeat the claim because the parties had proceeded on the basis of the sale arrangement. The fair market value was assessed at $900,000. The alleged oppression was not established, and Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd's cross-claim was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding for Specific Performance, Corporations Act S233 Oppression Relief and Share Valuation, With Company Cross Claim / Judgment After Hearing; Further Orders Reserved for Interest Damages and Costs
- Outcome
- Contract to be specifically performed; oppression claim not made out; cross-claim dismissed; costs reserved; matter to be listed for further orders concerning interest damages and costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['specific Performance' 'oppression Under Corporations Act S233' 'valuation of Shares' 'fair Market Value' 'quasi Partnership' 'cross Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding for Specific Performance, Corporations Act S233 Oppression Relief and Share Valuation, With Company Cross Claim / Judgment After Hearing; Further Orders Reserved for Interest Damages and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there was an enforceable contract requiring the other directors to purchase Mr Barbagallo's 25 percent shareholding in Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd at fair market value" 'Whether the phrase "fair market value" was void for uncertainty' "Whether the defendants' conduct amounted to oppression, unfair prejudice or unfairly discriminatory conduct under Corporations Act s233" 'How fair market value of the 25 percent shareholding should be assessed as at 30 June 2001' "Whether non-compliance with Article 4(1) of Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd's Articles of Association defeated the plaintiff's claim" "Whether Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd's cross-claim against Mr Barbagallo should succeed"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that in May or June 2001 Mr Barbagallo and the other four directors made an enforceable agreement that, if Mr Barbagallo resigned and ceased taking part in management, they would purchase his 25 percent shareholding at fair market value assessed as at 30 June 2001 using the method employed by Mr Bevan for Mr Wehby's earlier sale. The term "fair market value" was sufficiently certain and could be determined by the Court. Article 4(1) did not defeat the claim because the parties had proceeded on the basis of the sale arrangement. The fair market value was assessed at $900,000. The alleged oppression was not established, and Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd's cross-claim was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Contract to be specifically performed; oppression claim not made out; cross-claim dismissed; costs reserved; matter to be listed for further orders concerning interest damages and costs.
Orders
- ['The contract between Mr Barbagallo and Messrs Licciardello, Cassar, Duignan and Vella is to be specifically performed.' 'The case in oppression is not made out.' 'The cross-claim of Clifton Fletcher Pty Ltd is dismissed.' 'The matter is to be listed before Cripps AJ for further orders to give effect to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment