Alam v Cassaniti, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Sam Cassaniti [2007] FCA 598

Alam v Cassaniti, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Sam Cassaniti [2007] FCA 598

The affidavits provided by the applicants and their solicitor were sufficient to verify the creditor's petition and to prove the matters required under ss 47(1) and 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth); the grounds raised by the respondent did not succeed and the act of bankruptcy was established, warranting the making of a sequestration order.

Parties
First Applicant: Anis (also known as Andrew or Tony) Alam (also known as Anis El-Alam); Second Applicant: Beverly Dawn Alam (also known as Beverly Dawn El-Alam); Respondent: Sam Cassaniti
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Orders
Outcome
Sequestration order granted against the estate of Sam Cassaniti; adjournment application refused
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Act of Bankruptcy, Creditor's Petition, Verification of Affidavit, Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
Insolvency Bankruptcy Sequestration Order Act of Bankruptcy Creditor's Petition Verification of Affidavit Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anis (also known as Andrew or Tony) Alam (also known as Anis El-Alam)

First Applicant

Beverly Dawn Alam (also known as Beverly Dawn El-Alam)

Second Applicant

Sam Cassaniti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the creditor's petition was properly verified in accordance with s 47(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the requirements for proof under s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) were satisfied
  3. 3 Whether the act of bankruptcy alleged was committed

Ratio Decidendi

The affidavits provided by the applicants and their solicitor were sufficient to verify the creditor's petition and to prove the matters required under ss 47(1) and 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth); the grounds raised by the respondent did not succeed and the act of bankruptcy was established, warranting the making of a sequestration order.

Court Disposition

Sequestration order granted against the estate of Sam Cassaniti; adjournment application refused

Orders

  • A sequestration order against the estate of Sam Cassaniti is made.
  • Applicant creditors' costs (including any reserved costs) to be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).