Ekermawi v Jones and Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2011] NSWADT 280
The Tribunal found that the applicant is an Arab, that 'Arab' is a race within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), and that the complained of conduct was directed against the race to which the applicant belongs; therefore, the applicant has standing and the application to dismiss is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sam Ekermawi; First Respondent: Alan Jones; Second Respondent: Harbour Radio Pty Ltd t/as 2GB
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Standing
- Outcome
- Respondents' application to dismiss complaint refused; matter listed for case conference.
- Legal Topics
- Racial Vilification, Standing, Definition of Race, Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sam Ekermawi
Applicant
Alan Jones
First Respondent
Harbour Radio Pty Ltd t/as 2GB
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Standing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has standing under s 88 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) to bring a complaint of racial vilification
- 2 Whether 'Arab' is a 'race' within the meaning of the Act
- 3 Whether the comments in question concerned the applicant's race
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant is an Arab, that 'Arab' is a race within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), and that the complained of conduct was directed against the race to which the applicant belongs; therefore, the applicant has standing and the application to dismiss is refused.
Court Disposition
Respondents' application to dismiss complaint refused; matter listed for case conference.
Orders
- The respondents' application for all or part of the complaint to be dismissed is refused.
- The matter is listed for case conference on 19 December 2011 at 9.30am.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment