El Cheikh v Hurstville City Council & (2) Ors [2001] NSWLEC 175
None of the claimed statutory defaults under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and its regulations affecting public participation, provision of particulars, or reporting to the Minister, either individually or cumulatively, rendered Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 (Amendment No. 23) invalid. The public notification, read contextually, fulfilled both the form and purpose of s 66, and other procedural requirements were adequately satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['validity of Local Environmental Plan' 'public Notification Requirements' 'compliance With Statutory Procedures' 'director General Delegation' 'judicial Review Grounds']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the making of Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 (Amendment No. 23) was invalid for failure to comply with statutory requirements concerning public notification, information to the Director-General, and content of reports under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulation 1994.']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the claimed statutory defaults under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and its regulations affecting public participation, provision of particulars, or reporting to the Minister, either individually or cumulatively, rendered Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 (Amendment No. 23) invalid. The public notification, read contextually, fulfilled both the form and purpose of s 66, and other procedural requirements were adequately satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' 'The question of costs is reserved.' 'The exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment