Sama Zaraah Pty Ltd v 888 Projects Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1041

Sama Zaraah Pty Ltd v 888 Projects Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1041

The caveat claimed an interest in prospective lots in an unregistered proposed subdivision. Because any proprietary interest would arise only when it attached to an identifiable lot, the caveat was bad in substance. The defect was not a mere defect of form and was not saved by Real Property Act 1900 s 74L, so the summons to extend the caveat was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Application to Extend the Operation of a Caveat / Ex Tempore Judgment on Summons
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['caveats Against Dealing' 'proprietary Interest in Proposed Subdivision Lots' 'real Property Act 1900 S 74 L' 'defects of Form and Substance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Extend the Operation of a Caveat / Ex Tempore Judgment on Summons

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff had a proprietary interest capable of supporting a caveat over prospective lots in a proposed subdivision where the plan of subdivision had not been registered.' 'Whether Real Property Act 1900 s 74L required the court to disregard the defect in the caveat.']

Ratio Decidendi

The caveat claimed an interest in prospective lots in an unregistered proposed subdivision. Because any proprietary interest would arise only when it attached to an identifiable lot, the caveat was bad in substance. The defect was not a mere defect of form and was not saved by Real Property Act 1900 s 74L, so the summons to extend the caveat was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The summons is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs."]