Clark v National Australia Bank Limited [2019] FCA 933
Leave is granted to file and serve the amended originating application and further amended statement of claim because the claims concerning NAB Personal Loan Cover and NAB Credit Card Cover are sufficiently related, do not breach the Harman obligation, and satisfy the requirements for representative proceedings under s 33C of the Federal Court of Australia Act; practical and case management considerations favour granting leave.
- Parties
- Applicant: Samantha Clark; First Respondent: National Australia Bank Limited; Second Respondent: MLC Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Representative Proceedings / Leave to File and Serve Amended Pleadings
- Outcome
- Leave granted to applicant to file and serve amended pleadings; trial date to be rescheduled.
- Legal Topics
- Use of Discovered and Subpoenaed Documents, Harman Undertaking, Leave to Amend Pleadings, Representative Proceedings, Federal Court of Australia Act S 33 C, Unconscionable Conduct, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samantha Clark
Applicant
National Australia Bank Limited
First Respondent
MLC Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Representative Proceedings / Leave to File and Serve Amended Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether use of discovered and subpoenaed documents in amended pleadings breaches the implied Harman undertaking
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to file and serve amended originating application and statement of claim
- 3 Whether proposed amendments offend Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), in particular s 33C
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted to file and serve the amended originating application and further amended statement of claim because the claims concerning NAB Personal Loan Cover and NAB Credit Card Cover are sufficiently related, do not breach the Harman obligation, and satisfy the requirements for representative proceedings under s 33C of the Federal Court of Australia Act; practical and case management considerations favour granting leave.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to applicant to file and serve amended pleadings; trial date to be rescheduled.
Orders
- The Applicant has leave to file and serve an amended Originating Application and a further amended Statement of Claim in substantially the form annexed to the affidavit of Andrew Paull dated 29 May 2019.
- By 4.00pm on 14 June 2019, the Applicant file and serve the amended Originating Application and further amended Statement of Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment