Koutlis v Javleski [2015] NSWLEC 1533
There is insufficient evidence to support imminent or foreseeable risk of whole tree failure. Only shedding of dead wood poses a foreseeable risk in the next 12 months. Therefore, orders for removal are refused and limited to dead wood pruning in accordance with safe standards.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment on Application for Removal/pruning of Trees
- Outcome
- Application for removal refused; pruning orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours)' 'pruning of Amenity Trees' 'neighbour Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment on Application for Removal/pruning of Trees
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trees are likely to cause damage to property or injury to persons such that orders for removal or pruning should be made under s 10(2) Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
There is insufficient evidence to support imminent or foreseeable risk of whole tree failure. Only shedding of dead wood poses a foreseeable risk in the next 12 months. Therefore, orders for removal are refused and limited to dead wood pruning in accordance with safe standards.
Court Disposition
Application for removal refused; pruning orders made
Orders
- ['The application to remove five trees is refused.' "By 1 March 2016, the respondent is to have engaged and paid for an AQF level 3 arborist with appropriate insurance to remove deadwood >50mm in base diameter from all parts of the four trees overhanging the applicant's property, extending two metres into...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment