Thomas v Marriott Support Services [2013] FCA 308
Approval of the settlement is warranted because the compromise is in the applicant's best interests, taking into account the opinions of her legal advisers, counsel, and litigation representative, as required by Rule 9.70(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- General Protections Employment Proceeding / Application for Approval of Settlement by Litigation Representative
- Outcome
- Settlement approved
- Legal Topics
- ['approval of Settlement for Person Under Disability' 'general Protections Under Fair Work Act' 'application by Litigation Representative']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
General Protections Employment Proceeding / Application for Approval of Settlement by Litigation Representative
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the settlement between the parties should be approved by the Court under Rule 9.70 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Approval of the settlement is warranted because the compromise is in the applicant's best interests, taking into account the opinions of her legal advisers, counsel, and litigation representative, as required by Rule 9.70(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Settlement approved
Orders
- ['Pursuant to Rule 9.70 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the settlement recorded in the deed of release exhibited as KW-1 to the affidavit of Ms Kairstien Wilson sworn on 3 April 2013 is approved.' "The affidavit of Kairstien Wilson sworn on 3 April 2013 and its exhibits are to be treated as confidential and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment