Thomas v Marriott Support Services [2013] FCA 308

Thomas v Marriott Support Services [2013] FCA 308

Approval of the settlement is warranted because the compromise is in the applicant's best interests, taking into account the opinions of her legal advisers, counsel, and litigation representative, as required by Rule 9.70(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 April 2013
Procedural Posture
General Protections Employment Proceeding / Application for Approval of Settlement by Litigation Representative
Outcome
Settlement approved
Legal Topics
['approval of Settlement for Person Under Disability' 'general Protections Under Fair Work Act' 'application by Litigation Representative']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

General Protections Employment Proceeding / Application for Approval of Settlement by Litigation Representative

  1. 1 ['Whether the settlement between the parties should be approved by the Court under Rule 9.70 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

Approval of the settlement is warranted because the compromise is in the applicant's best interests, taking into account the opinions of her legal advisers, counsel, and litigation representative, as required by Rule 9.70(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).

Court Disposition

Settlement approved

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to Rule 9.70 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the settlement recorded in the deed of release exhibited as KW-1 to the affidavit of Ms Kairstien Wilson sworn on 3 April 2013 is approved.' "The affidavit of Kairstien Wilson sworn on 3 April 2013 and its exhibits are to be treated as confidential and...