Hawchar v Marshall [2020] NSWDC 719
The plaintiff failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in commencing proceedings as required by s 109(3)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), due to unexplained gaps in evidence about his and his solicitors' conduct. Therefore, leave to commence proceedings out of time was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Notice of Motion for Leave to Commence Proceedings Outside Limitation Period
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; costs awarded to defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to File Claim Out of Time' 'limitation Period Under Motor Accidents Compensation Act' 'monetary Threshold for Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Notice of Motion for Leave to Commence Proceedings Outside Limitation Period
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff provided a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in commencing proceedings as required by s 109(3)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)' 'Whether the likely damages exceed the monetary threshold under s 109(3)(b) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to provide a full and satisfactory explanation for the delay in commencing proceedings as required by s 109(3)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), due to unexplained gaps in evidence about his and his solicitors' conduct. Therefore, leave to commence proceedings out of time was refused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; costs awarded to defendant.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion filed on 21 July 2020 is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the Motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment