Jeihooni v Woollahra Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 1539
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for approval of the amended development application subject to conditions. The Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because relevant statutory considerations and preconditions were addressed, the clause 4.6 request justified contravention of the height standard, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified. The Court was therefore required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da/510/2018 / Orders Following Court Arranged Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Dwelling' 'conciliation Conference' 'clause 4.6 Written Request' 'height Development Standard' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da/510/2018 / Orders Following Court Arranged Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders giving effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether development consent could be granted for works including publicly accessible stairs and lookout to accommodate the proposed garage entry.' "Whether the applicant's clause 4.6 written request justified contravention of the maximum height development standard in clause 4.3 of the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014." 'Whether relevant planning instruments and preconditions, including State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land, State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004, State Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005 and Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014, permitted approval subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for approval of the amended development application subject to conditions. The Commissioner was satisfied the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because relevant statutory considerations and preconditions were addressed, the clause 4.6 request justified contravention of the height standard, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified. The Court was therefore required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended architectural plans and material as referred to in condition A.3 of the conditions of consent contained at Annexure "A" and the amended clause 4.6 written request at Annexure "B".' 'The Applicant\'s written request under clause 4.6 of the Woollahra Local...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment