R v EVANS [2006] NSWDC 89
Given the lack of suitable alternatives to custody due to Mr Evans' intellectual disability and his having served some time in custody, the imposition of a good behaviour bond was the most appropriate sentence available.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Severity Appeal / Appeal From Local Court
- Outcome
- appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['severity Appeal' 'intellectual Disability' 'graffiti' 'assault' 'indecent Exposure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Severity Appeal / Appeal From Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentencing options for an intellectually disabled offender' 'Availability of alternatives to full-time custody for intellectually disabled offenders' 'Whether a good behaviour bond is a suitable sentence given intellectual disability and the nature of the offences']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the lack of suitable alternatives to custody due to Mr Evans' intellectual disability and his having served some time in custody, the imposition of a good behaviour bond was the most appropriate sentence available.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed
Orders
- ['In relation to each of the five matters, pursuant to s 9, Mr Evans is to enter into a good behaviour bond for two years from today.' 'He is to appear before the Court if called upon.' 'He is to be of good behaviour.' 'He is to inform the Registrar of changes of residential address.' 'He is to accept supervision...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment