REGINA v. LEVER [2000] NSWSC 953
As the jury rejected diminished responsibility, sentencing must proceed on the basis that the offender was not suffering from an abnormality of mind sufficient to reduce culpability, but special circumstances arising from his mental condition, prior deprivation, Aboriginality, rehabilitation prospects, and lengthy pre-sentence custody justify a reduced total sentence and adjusted parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'diminished Responsibility' 'sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the offender's mental condition at the time of the killing warranted a defence of diminished responsibility" 'Appropriate sentencing for murder given mental illness evidence and objective seriousness']
Ratio Decidendi
As the jury rejected diminished responsibility, sentencing must proceed on the basis that the offender was not suffering from an abnormality of mind sufficient to reduce culpability, but special circumstances arising from his mental condition, prior deprivation, Aboriginality, rehabilitation prospects, and lengthy pre-sentence custody justify a reduced total sentence and adjusted parole period.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- ['Total sentence of 13 years imprisonment commencing 30 November 1999' 'Non-parole period of nine years expiring 29 November 2008' 'Parole period of four years commencing 30 November 2008' 'Recommendation for psychiatric or psychological treatment']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment