Piscopo v NOT Lawyers [2008] FCA 1907
Indemnity costs are justified from 5 December 2008 because the proceedings could and should have been resolved on the basis offered by the respondents before that date.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings / Final Judgment/order
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed; costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'undertakings' 'dismissal of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Proceedings / Final Judgment/order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded against the applicant' 'Whether the undertakings offered constitute a satisfactory solution to the dispute']
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs are justified from 5 December 2008 because the proceedings could and should have been resolved on the basis offered by the respondents before that date.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed; costs awarded.
Orders
- ['Proceedings otherwise be dismissed.' "Applicant to pay respondents' costs of and incidental to the proceedings (as taxed or agreed) on a party/party basis up to and including 4 December 2008 and on an indemnity basis from 5 December 2008." "Upon Ms Jacki Lynn Cole's undertakings as described in the judgment."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment