Rose v Piscopo [2009] FCA 261
Given the undertakings by Senior Counsel for the respondent not to permit the cross-examination to amount to a dress-rehearsal of the examination summons and to seek confidentiality over the transcript, leave to appeal is refused and proceedings may continue before the Federal Magistrate.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Elena Rose; Second Applicant: Michael O'Neill; Third Applicant: Terry Hill; Respondent: Samuel Piscopo
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Rulings
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Appeal, Examination Summons, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elena Rose
First Applicant
Michael O'Neill
Second Applicant
Terry Hill
Third Applicant
Samuel Piscopo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from interlocutory rulings permitting certain cross-examination and refusing adjournment in Bankruptcy proceedings
- 2 Whether the continuation of cross-examination would render the application to set aside examination summonses nugatory
Ratio Decidendi
Given the undertakings by Senior Counsel for the respondent not to permit the cross-examination to amount to a dress-rehearsal of the examination summons and to seek confidentiality over the transcript, leave to appeal is refused and proceedings may continue before the Federal Magistrate.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed
- Undertakings given by Senior Counsel for the Respondent to not permit cross-examination to amount to a dress-rehearsal of the examination summons and to seek confidentiality over the transcript
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment