Bajwa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 904

Bajwa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 904

The application was filed nearly two months after the last date for filing a notice of appeal. The applicant gave no facts explaining the delay and identified no material showing that the Federal Circuit Court decision was erroneous, sufficiently doubtful, or that refusal of an extension and leave would cause substantial injustice. The proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects because the Tribunal was entitled on the material before it to find no evidence of current enrolment or offer of enrolment and no evidence satisfying the English language requirement, and the Federal Circuit Court had properly rejected the grounds advanced. The extension of time and leave to appeal were therefore...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Visa Decision / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal in the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review of Migration Decision' 'student (temporary) (class Tu) Visa' 'enrolment and English Language Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Visa Decision / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal in the Federal Court of Australia

  1. 1 ['Whether time should be extended to file a notice of appeal from the Federal Circuit Court decision.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted.' 'Whether the applicant gave an adequate explanation for failing to file within time.' 'Whether the proposed appeal showed sufficient merit, legal error, sufficient doubt about the correctness of the Federal Circuit Court decision, or substantial injustice if leave were refused.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application was filed nearly two months after the last date for filing a notice of appeal. The applicant gave no facts explaining the delay and identified no material showing that the Federal Circuit Court decision was erroneous, sufficiently doubtful, or that refusal of an extension and leave would cause substantial injustice. The proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects because the Tribunal was entitled on the material before it to find no evidence of current enrolment or offer of enrolment and no evidence satisfying the English language requirement, and the Federal Circuit Court had properly rejected the grounds advanced. The extension of time and leave to appeal were therefore...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed with costs.']