Bajwa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 904
The application was filed nearly two months after the last date for filing a notice of appeal. The applicant gave no facts explaining the delay and identified no material showing that the Federal Circuit Court decision was erroneous, sufficiently doubtful, or that refusal of an extension and leave would cause substantial injustice. The proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects because the Tribunal was entitled on the material before it to find no evidence of current enrolment or offer of enrolment and no evidence satisfying the English language requirement, and the Federal Circuit Court had properly rejected the grounds advanced. The extension of time and leave to appeal were therefore...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Visa Decision / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal in the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review of Migration Decision' 'student (temporary) (class Tu) Visa' 'enrolment and English Language Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of a Tribunal Visa Decision / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal in the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time should be extended to file a notice of appeal from the Federal Circuit Court decision.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted.' 'Whether the applicant gave an adequate explanation for failing to file within time.' 'Whether the proposed appeal showed sufficient merit, legal error, sufficient doubt about the correctness of the Federal Circuit Court decision, or substantial injustice if leave were refused.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed nearly two months after the last date for filing a notice of appeal. The applicant gave no facts explaining the delay and identified no material showing that the Federal Circuit Court decision was erroneous, sufficiently doubtful, or that refusal of an extension and leave would cause substantial injustice. The proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects because the Tribunal was entitled on the material before it to find no evidence of current enrolment or offer of enrolment and no evidence satisfying the English language requirement, and the Federal Circuit Court had properly rejected the grounds advanced. The extension of time and leave to appeal were therefore...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment