H Lundbeck A/S v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 740
The remitted proceeding for damages and pre-judgment interest should be stayed pending the final determination of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal review of the Commissioner's grant of a patent licence, since difficult legal questions concerning the effect and scope of the licence remain, and resolution of the Tribunal review may obviate the need to address these matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Litigation Interlocutory Application / Application for Stay of Remitted Proceeding Pending Determination of Tribunal Review
- Outcome
- Application for stay granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['patents' 'practice and Procedure' 'stay of Proceedings' 'damages Recalculation' 'statutory Licence Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Patent Litigation Interlocutory Application / Application for Stay of Remitted Proceeding Pending Determination of Tribunal Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of the remitted proceeding should be granted pending final determination of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal review of the patent licence' 'Whether the entitlement to damages and pre-judgment interest requires determination prior to resolution of the licence review' 'The scope and effect of a statutory licence granted under s 223(9) of the Patents Act on damages']
Ratio Decidendi
The remitted proceeding for damages and pre-judgment interest should be stayed pending the final determination of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal review of the Commissioner's grant of a patent licence, since difficult legal questions concerning the effect and scope of the licence remain, and resolution of the Tribunal review may obviate the need to address these matters.
Court Disposition
Application for stay granted.
Orders
- ['The proceeding be stayed pending the final determination of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal review case AAT2019/2512, including all appeals and special leave applications.' "The applicants pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 23 August 2022."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment