Booth v Granata (No 2) [2020] FCA 1425
The court was satisfied that the respondent had been convicted in Australia of an offence relating to terrorism and that each of the obligations, prohibitions and restrictions imposed by the control order are reasonably necessary, appropriate and adapted for the purposes specified in s 104.4(1)(d). Therefore, the control order was confirmed, subject to some variations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Confirmation of Interim Control Order / Confirmation Hearing
- Outcome
- Control order confirmed with variations.
- Legal Topics
- ['control Orders' 'terrorism Offences' 'confirmation Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Confirmation of Interim Control Order / Confirmation Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the obligations, prohibitions and restrictions imposed by the interim control order are reasonably necessary, appropriate and adapted under s 104.14 and s 104.4 of the Criminal Code']
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied that the respondent had been convicted in Australia of an offence relating to terrorism and that each of the obligations, prohibitions and restrictions imposed by the control order are reasonably necessary, appropriate and adapted for the purposes specified in s 104.4(1)(d). Therefore, the control order was confirmed, subject to some variations.
Court Disposition
Control order confirmed with variations.
Orders
- ['The obligations, prohibitions and restrictions imposed on the respondent by the confirmed control order are those set out in Annexure A to these Orders.' 'The confirmed control order is in force until and including 2 June 2021.' "The Respondent's lawyer may attend the AFP Melbourne office to obtain a copy of these...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment