Booth v Thorne [2021] FCA 380

Booth v Thorne [2021] FCA 380

Given the agreed facts, the respondent's lack of opposition and supporting affidavit evidence, all preconditions in s 104.4(1) are established and the controls are reasonably necessary and adapted to reduce the risk of terrorism-related conduct. The interim control order is therefore granted in the terms agreed by the parties.

Parties
Applicant: Sandra Booth; Respondent: Shayden Jamil Thorne
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Application for Interim Control Order / Interim Control Order Ex Parte; Scheduled for Confirmation Hearing
Outcome
Application for interim control order granted; orders made as agreed
Legal Topics
Interim Control Orders, Control of Terrorism Risk, S 104.4 Criminal Code, Suppression Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sandra Booth

Applicant

Shayden Jamil Thorne

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law Application for Interim Control Order / Interim Control Order Ex Parte; Scheduled for Confirmation Hearing

  1. 1 Whether pre-conditions in s 104.4(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) are satisfied
  2. 2 Whether the proposed controls are reasonably necessary, appropriate, and adapted

Ratio Decidendi

Given the agreed facts, the respondent's lack of opposition and supporting affidavit evidence, all preconditions in s 104.4(1) are established and the controls are reasonably necessary and adapted to reduce the risk of terrorism-related conduct. The interim control order is therefore granted in the terms agreed by the parties.

Court Disposition

Application for interim control order granted; orders made as agreed

Orders

  • The Court makes an interim control order pursuant to s 104.4 of the Criminal Code (Cth) in the terms set out in the Schedule.
  • The proceeding is listed for hearing on 9 June 2021 at 11:00am.