Sandra Investments Pty Ltd v Booth [1983] HCA 46
Where a contract for sale of land contains a condition precedent expressly conferring on the purchaser the option to cancel if the condition (council approval) is not fulfilled, the purchaser may choose not to exercise that option and is entitled to specific performance, with completion to occur within a reasonable time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal of a Decision From the Supreme Court of Queensland
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['specific Performance' 'contractual Conditions Precedent' 'waiver of Conditions' 'sale of Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal of a Decision From the Supreme Court of Queensland
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a purchaser may waive a condition precedent requiring council approval for subdivision under a contract for sale of land' 'Whether specific performance may be ordered when the approval condition is not fulfilled but waived by the purchaser']
Ratio Decidendi
Where a contract for sale of land contains a condition precedent expressly conferring on the purchaser the option to cancel if the condition (council approval) is not fulfilled, the purchaser may choose not to exercise that option and is entitled to specific performance, with completion to occur within a reasonable time.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland set aside' "Order that Dunn J.'s decision is set aside" 'Judgment for plaintiff for specific performance of the contract referred to in paragraph 3 of the statement of claim' "Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs of the action" 'Matter remitted to Supreme...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment