Loxton v Loxton [2008] NSWSC 227

Loxton v Loxton [2008] NSWSC 227

The plaintiff lived in the deceased's household for less than four years, that period ended 25 years earlier, and there was no close continuing relationship with the deceased. In the context of a small estate and the deceased's son's greater claim to the Sadleir property, the Court concluded there were no factors warranting the making of the application under s 9 of the Family Provision Act 1982, and the proceedings should be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim Under the Family Provision Act 1982 / Principal Judgment; Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
No provision for plaintiff. No order for costs.
Legal Topics
['claim by Stepdaughter of Deceased' 'eligible Person' 'factors Warranting the Making of the Application' 'notional Estate' 'small Estate' 'costs']
['succession' 'family Provision'] ['claim by Stepdaughter of Deceased' 'eligible Person' 'factors Warranting the Making of the Application' 'notional Estate' 'small Estate' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim Under the Family Provision Act 1982 / Principal Judgment; Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether there were factors under s 9 of the Family Provision Act 1982 warranting the making of the plaintiff stepdaughter's application." 'Whether the plaintiff would be generally regarded as a natural object of testamentary recognition by the deceased.' "Whether the plaintiff had been left without proper provision from the deceased's estate." 'Whether any provision would require the Sadleir property to be designated as notional property and sold.']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff lived in the deceased's household for less than four years, that period ended 25 years earlier, and there was no close continuing relationship with the deceased. In the context of a small estate and the deceased's son's greater claim to the Sadleir property, the Court concluded there were no factors warranting the making of the application under s 9 of the Family Provision Act 1982, and the proceedings should be dismissed.

Court Disposition

No provision for plaintiff. No order for costs.

Orders

  • ['Proceedings dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']