Rowlands v MacDonald [2002] NSWSC 282
Clause 2 operated on Ms MacDonald's notice to cause the partnership to determine, and because there was no other arrangement and no exercise of the clause 23 purchase right, clause 21 required accounting, realisation of property, payment of debts and distribution of surplus. Clause 26 did not prevent this result. In circumstances of serious mistrust, failed informal winding up, difficulty obtaining financial information, and evidence suggesting possible financial irregularities and intermingling of funds, an order merely taking accounts was insufficient and a receiver should be appointed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Partnership Dissolution and Winding Up Proceedings / Interlocutory Notices of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver and for Taking of Accounts
- Outcome
- Receiver to be appointed; taking of accounts alone refused as insufficient; detailed form of orders deferred pending further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['dissolution of Partnership' 'winding Up of Partnership' 'appointment of Receiver' 'taking of Accounts' 'partnership Assets and Duties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Partnership Dissolution and Winding Up Proceedings / Interlocutory Notices of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver and for Taking of Accounts
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the partnership had been dissolved or determined after Ms MacDonald's notice of retirement." 'Whether clause 26 of the partnership agreement prevented dissolution as between the remaining partners.' 'Whether the court should order the taking of accounts or appoint a receiver of the partnership business.' 'What factors were relevant to the discretionary appointment of a receiver.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2 operated on Ms MacDonald's notice to cause the partnership to determine, and because there was no other arrangement and no exercise of the clause 23 purchase right, clause 21 required accounting, realisation of property, payment of debts and distribution of surplus. Clause 26 did not prevent this result. In circumstances of serious mistrust, failed informal winding up, difficulty obtaining financial information, and evidence suggesting possible financial irregularities and intermingling of funds, an order merely taking accounts was insufficient and a receiver should be appointed.
Court Disposition
Receiver to be appointed; taking of accounts alone refused as insufficient; detailed form of orders deferred pending further submissions.
Orders
- ['A receiver is to be appointed to the partnership business.' 'Mr Silvia is the appropriate appointee, his consent to act having been tendered.' 'Detailed orders were deferred until further submissions on their form.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment