Rowlands v MacDonald [2002] NSWSC 282

Rowlands v MacDonald [2002] NSWSC 282

Clause 2 operated on Ms MacDonald's notice to cause the partnership to determine, and because there was no other arrangement and no exercise of the clause 23 purchase right, clause 21 required accounting, realisation of property, payment of debts and distribution of surplus. Clause 26 did not prevent this result. In circumstances of serious mistrust, failed informal winding up, difficulty obtaining financial information, and evidence suggesting possible financial irregularities and intermingling of funds, an order merely taking accounts was insufficient and a receiver should be appointed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Partnership Dissolution and Winding Up Proceedings / Interlocutory Notices of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver and for Taking of Accounts
Outcome
Receiver to be appointed; taking of accounts alone refused as insufficient; detailed form of orders deferred pending further submissions.
Legal Topics
['dissolution of Partnership' 'winding Up of Partnership' 'appointment of Receiver' 'taking of Accounts' 'partnership Assets and Duties']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Partnership Dissolution and Winding Up Proceedings / Interlocutory Notices of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver and for Taking of Accounts

  1. 1 ["Whether the partnership had been dissolved or determined after Ms MacDonald's notice of retirement." 'Whether clause 26 of the partnership agreement prevented dissolution as between the remaining partners.' 'Whether the court should order the taking of accounts or appoint a receiver of the partnership business.' 'What factors were relevant to the discretionary appointment of a receiver.']

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 2 operated on Ms MacDonald's notice to cause the partnership to determine, and because there was no other arrangement and no exercise of the clause 23 purchase right, clause 21 required accounting, realisation of property, payment of debts and distribution of surplus. Clause 26 did not prevent this result. In circumstances of serious mistrust, failed informal winding up, difficulty obtaining financial information, and evidence suggesting possible financial irregularities and intermingling of funds, an order merely taking accounts was insufficient and a receiver should be appointed.

Court Disposition

Receiver to be appointed; taking of accounts alone refused as insufficient; detailed form of orders deferred pending further submissions.

Orders

  • ['A receiver is to be appointed to the partnership business.' 'Mr Silvia is the appropriate appointee, his consent to act having been tendered.' 'Detailed orders were deferred until further submissions on their form.']