Khanna v Insurance Australia Ltd [2025] NSWSC 33
The Plaintiff failed to establish that the Review Panels committed jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record. The Review Panels applied the correct statutory framework, followed procedures consistent with the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (NSW), associated Regulations and Rules, gave adequate reasons, and considered all relevant evidence, including the Plaintiff’s submissions. The Court found no basis to set aside the Review Panels’ Certificates.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sanjeev Khanna; First Defendant: Insurance Australia Limited; Second Defendant: Personal Injury Commission; Third Defendant: President of the Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Medical Assessment, Review Panels, Error of Law, Jurisdictional Error, Motor Accidents Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanjeev Khanna
Plaintiff
Insurance Australia Limited
First Defendant
Personal Injury Commission
Second Defendant
President of the Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Review Panels committed jurisdictional error or an error of law on the face of the record in issuing medical assessment certificates under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff failed to establish that the Review Panels committed jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record. The Review Panels applied the correct statutory framework, followed procedures consistent with the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (NSW), associated Regulations and Rules, gave adequate reasons, and considered all relevant evidence, including the Plaintiff’s submissions. The Court found no basis to set aside the Review Panels’ Certificates.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed with costs
Orders
- Proceedings No. 2023/00305474 be dismissed with costs.
- Proceedings No. 2024/00080728 be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment