SAP Australia Pty Ltd v Sapient Australia Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1027

SAP Australia Pty Ltd v Sapient Australia Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1027

The use of the word 'Sapient' by the respondent was not found to be deceptively similar to either the SAP or SAPIENT COLLEGE trade marks, considering the context and differences between the businesses. Nor was the use considered to be misleading or deceptive or to constitute a misrepresentation supporting passing off. There was evidence of some confusion, but not of misrepresentation or likelihood of damage.

Parties
First Applicant: SAP Australia Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: SAP Aktiengesellschaft; Respondent: Sapient Australia Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 July 1999
Procedural Posture
Application and Cross Claim / Final Judgment After Hearing at First Instance
Outcome
Application dismissed; Cross-claim dismissed; Applicants to pay respondent's costs, excluding Cross-claim costs.
Legal Topics
Trade Mark Infringement, Deceptive Conduct, Misleading Representations, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Trade Practices Tort Trade Mark Infringement Deceptive Conduct Misleading Representations Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SAP Australia Pty Ltd

First Applicant

SAP Aktiengesellschaft

Second Applicant

Sapient Australia Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application and Cross Claim / Final Judgment After Hearing at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether use of 'Sapient' infringes SAP and SAPIENT COLLEGE registered trade marks under Trade Marks Act 1995 ss120(1), 120(2)
  2. 2 Whether use of 'Sapient' is misleading or deceptive or falsely suggests sponsorship or association under Trade Practices Act 1974 ss52, 53(c), 53(d)
  3. 3 Whether use of 'Sapient' amounts to passing off

Ratio Decidendi

The use of the word 'Sapient' by the respondent was not found to be deceptively similar to either the SAP or SAPIENT COLLEGE trade marks, considering the context and differences between the businesses. Nor was the use considered to be misleading or deceptive or to constitute a misrepresentation supporting passing off. There was evidence of some confusion, but not of misrepresentation or likelihood of damage.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; Cross-claim dismissed; Applicants to pay respondent's costs, excluding Cross-claim costs.

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.
  • The Cross-claim be dismissed.