Goldsteen v TCI Bondi Junction Pty Ltd (In Liq) (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 281
The Tribunal held that the additional conduct complained of by the applicant is connected to the original complaint, occurred after the original complaint was made, and its inclusion by amendment is in the interests of a full resolution and avoidance of duplicative proceedings; no sufficient basis was shown for refusing leave, nor did the respondent establish that the proposed amendment was futile or fell within any grounds for declinature. Therefore, the application to amend the complaint is granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Goldsteen; First Respondent: TCI Bondi Junction Pty Ltd (in liq); Second Respondent: Babak Moini
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Anti Discrimination/employment Complaint / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Amend Complaint
- Outcome
- Application to amend complaint granted; directions for further conduct made
- Legal Topics
- Discrimination in Employment, Amendment of Complaint, Sex Discrimination, Carer's Responsibility, Victimisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Goldsteen
Applicant
TCI Bondi Junction Pty Ltd (in liq)
First Respondent
Babak Moini
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Anti Discrimination/employment Complaint / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Amend Complaint
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the anti-discrimination complaint to include additional conduct occurring after the original complaint was made
- 2 Whether the additional conduct forms part of a course of discriminatory conduct under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should exercise its discretion under s 103 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 to permit the amendment
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the additional conduct complained of by the applicant is connected to the original complaint, occurred after the original complaint was made, and its inclusion by amendment is in the interests of a full resolution and avoidance of duplicative proceedings; no sufficient basis was shown for refusing leave, nor did the respondent establish that the proposed amendment was futile or fell within any grounds for declinature. Therefore, the application to amend the complaint is granted.
Court Disposition
Application to amend complaint granted; directions for further conduct made
Orders
- The application to amend the Complaint referred to the Tribunal by the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board is granted.
- The Applicant is to file and serve the Amended Complaint and Amended Points of Claim, the evidence including witness statements on which she intends to rely, and submissions, on or before 19 January 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment