Burns v Grevler [2010] NSWSC 1219

Burns v Grevler [2010] NSWSC 1219

The defendant, as both syndicate participant and accountant, owed the plaintiff fiduciary and tortious duties to disclose known material information, including the worthlessness of guarantees offered by other participants. His silence and structural recommendations constituted misleading conduct and breach of duty....

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'negligence' 'fiduciary Duty' 'duty of Care']
['equity' 'torts' 'trade and Commerce'] ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'negligence' 'fiduciary Duty' 'duty of Care']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether defendant engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)' 'Whether defendant breached duty of care owed to plaintiff in connection with investment in restaurant business' 'Whether defendant breached fiduciary obligations owed to plaintiff' "Whether defendant's silence or omissions constituted actionable conduct" "Whether plaintiff relied on defendant's conduct and suffered loss as a result"]

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, as both syndicate participant and accountant, owed the plaintiff fiduciary and tortious duties to disclose known material information, including the worthlessness of guarantees offered by other participants. His silence and structural recommendations constituted misleading conduct and breach of duty. Plaintiff relied on the defendant's conduct and representations, and would not have invested had the facts been disclosed. Full recovery of losses (less amounts repaid) was awarded.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,912,713.02, excluding interest to be calculated and added.' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs (issue of indemnity costs to be determined on 22 October 2010)."]