Moss -v- Burgess [2009] NSWDC 138
The court found that a domestic relationship existed between the parties from 1990 until September 2006, with the plaintiff making substantial contributions as homemaker enabling the defendant to increase his assets and subdivide property. The asset pool attributable to the relationship was assessed at $1,109,000 (excluding receipts from the defendant's mother's estate). Taking into account previous payments made to the plaintiff, the court held a fair adjustment to be an award of $195,000 to the plaintiff.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff for $195,000 and costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['property Adjustment' 'de Facto Relationships' 'homemaker Contributions' 'assessment of Asset Pool' 'failure to Disclose Assets']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether and when the domestic relationship between the parties ended' 'What assets form the divisible pool for adjustment' 'Respective contributions of the parties during the relationship' 'Appropriate adjustment of property interests']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that a domestic relationship existed between the parties from 1990 until September 2006, with the plaintiff making substantial contributions as homemaker enabling the defendant to increase his assets and subdivide property. The asset pool attributable to the relationship was assessed at $1,109,000 (excluding receipts from the defendant's mother's estate). Taking into account previous payments made to the plaintiff, the court held a fair adjustment to be an award of $195,000 to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff for $195,000 and costs.
Orders
- ['Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $195,000.' "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. This order is suspended for seven days to allow the parties to list the matter for argument, if required." 'The exhibits are returned.' 'My reasons are published.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment