Wong v Board of Studies New South Wales [2010] NSWADT 274
Leave should be granted for Ms Wong's complaint to proceed because, while her direct discrimination claim appears unlikely to succeed, it is possible that a relevant requirement or condition for an indirect discrimination claim could be identified if the service provided is defined broadly. Given the complexity of the law and her lack of legal representation, it is fair and just to allow the matter to proceed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Leave Application (anti Discrimination) / Decision on Application for Leave to Proceed After Complaint Declined by President
- Outcome
- Leave granted for the applicant's complaint to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Discrimination' 'leave to Proceed' 'provision of Services' 'direct Discrimination' 'indirect Discrimination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Leave Application (anti Discrimination) / Decision on Application for Leave to Proceed After Complaint Declined by President
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether to grant leave for applicant's complaint of disability discrimination to proceed despite prior declination by President of the Anti-Discrimination Board" 'Whether the complaint has sufficient merit to proceed']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave should be granted for Ms Wong's complaint to proceed because, while her direct discrimination claim appears unlikely to succeed, it is possible that a relevant requirement or condition for an indirect discrimination claim could be identified if the service provided is defined broadly. Given the complexity of the law and her lack of legal representation, it is fair and just to allow the matter to proceed.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for the applicant's complaint to proceed.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted for the applicant's complaint of disability discrimination to proceed" 'The matter is listed for case conference on 8 December 2010 at 3pm']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment