Ronald Hystek v SAS Trustee Corporation [2009] NSWIRComm 56
The appellant had not performed full police duties after the November 1993 firearms incident and was incapable of performing the duties of a police officer because his psychiatric disorder affected his ability to perform duties including those involving firearms. By 2 April 2008, the psychiatric disorder, together with the bodily infirmities already stated on the certificate, made him incapable of discharging the duties of his office, so the respondent's refusal to amend the certificate could not stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Police Superannuation Appeal / Appeal to the Industrial Court of New South Wales Against a Decision of the SAS Trustee Corporation Disputes Committee Declining to Amend a Certificate of Incapacity
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['police Medical Retirement' 'hurt on Duty Superannuation Allowance' 'certificate of Incapacity' 'specified Infirmity of Body or Mind' 'psychiatric Incapacity' 'multiple Infirmities']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Police Superannuation Appeal / Appeal to the Industrial Court of New South Wales Against a Decision of the SAS Trustee Corporation Disputes Committee Declining to Amend a Certificate of Incapacity
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant's certificate of incapacity should be amended to include a psychiatric condition as a specified infirmity of mind." "Whether the appellant's psychiatric condition was causally connected to his incapability to perform the duties or functions of a police officer." 'Whether multiple infirmities may be specified on a certificate of incapacity under s 10B(1) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had not performed full police duties after the November 1993 firearms incident and was incapable of performing the duties of a police officer because his psychiatric disorder affected his ability to perform duties including those involving firearms. By 2 April 2008, the psychiatric disorder, together with the bodily infirmities already stated on the certificate, made him incapable of discharging the duties of his office, so the respondent's refusal to amend the certificate could not stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The certificate issued, as amended by the respondent, is further amended from that date by the addition of a further specified infirmity, namely: "a psychiatric disorder of generalised anxiety with panic attacks and a panic disorder with major depressive episodes."' "As to costs, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment