Satellite & Wireless Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for Brighton on Broadwater Sundale North 1 Community Titles Scheme 48640 [2018] FCA 723
Because Satellite & Wireless was a licensed telecommunications carrier, had given notice under Sch 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 for an inspection, received no objection, and was apparently refused access to the roof without reasonable cause, and because the served respondents failed to appear, the applicant...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunctive Relief by a Licensed Telecommunications Carrier Against Body Corporate Respondents / First Case Management Hearing; Judgment Made in Default After the Respondents Failed to Appear
- Outcome
- Injunction granted; respondents ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['licensed Telecommunications Carrier' 'statutory Land Access and Inspection Rights' 'injunctive Relief' 'default Judgment' 'telecommunications Act 1997 (cth)']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunctive Relief by a Licensed Telecommunications Carrier Against Body Corporate Respondents / First Case Management Hearing; Judgment Made in Default After the Respondents Failed to Appear
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was entitled to injunctive relief restraining the respondents from interfering with its statutory rights under Div 2 of Pt 1 of Sch 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.' "Whether the respondents' failure to appear after service of the originating application and supporting affidavits constituted an event of default permitting relief." 'Whether the applicant had given notice under Sch 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 and had been refused access to inspect the roof of the building without reasonable cause.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because Satellite & Wireless was a licensed telecommunications carrier, had given notice under Sch 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 for an inspection, received no objection, and was apparently refused access to the roof without reasonable cause, and because the served respondents failed to appear, the applicant was entitled to injunctive relief enforcing its statutory access and inspection rights.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted; respondents ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
Orders
- ["The respondents by themselves, their employees, servants and/or agents, and/or representatives, are restrained from, and an injunction issue to restrain the respondents by themselves, their employees, servants and/or agents, and/or representatives, from interfering with the applicant's statutory rights under Div 2...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment