Jahangir v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 656

Jahangir v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 656

The appeal was dismissed because the RRT had addressed the asserted factual matters to the extent necessary on its reasoning, including rejecting the appellant's claimed senior office-bearer status and relying on country information about the Jamat-e-Islami and political violence in Bangladesh. The findings challenged under par 476(1)(g) were supported by evidentiary material before the RRT, and the asserted finding that the appellant had not been persecuted for reasons of political opinion was in any event a conclusion rather than a particular fact for par 476(4)(b). No error by the primary Judge warranting appellate intervention was shown.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Under Subs 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'failure to Address Evidence' 'no Evidence Ground' 'particular Fact']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'failure to Address Evidence' 'no Evidence Ground' 'particular Fact']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Under Subs 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the primary Judge erred in dismissing the application for review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision affirming refusal of a protection visa." 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to address asserted facts concerning political and religious organisations in Bangladesh so as to enliven pars 476(1)(e) or 476(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), read with par 430(1)(b).' "Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision was based on particular facts that did not exist and for which there was no evidentiary material, within par 476(1)(g) read with par 476(4)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the RRT had addressed the asserted factual matters to the extent necessary on its reasoning, including rejecting the appellant's claimed senior office-bearer status and relying on country information about the Jamat-e-Islami and political violence in Bangladesh. The findings challenged under par 476(1)(g) were supported by evidentiary material before the RRT, and the asserted finding that the appellant had not been persecuted for reasons of political opinion was in any event a conclusion rather than a particular fact for par 476(4)(b). No error by the primary Judge warranting appellate intervention was shown.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]