Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 67

Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 67

The appellant had not shown jurisdictional error by the Migration Review Tribunal; for the reasons given in Islam v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 66, the Tribunal was not required to average the appellant's working hours over the broader period and could focus on the period when he worked more than 20 hours a week in breach of Condition 8104.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['student Visa Cancellation' 'condition 8104' 'jurisdictional Error' 'migration Review Tribunal Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal

  1. 1 ["Whether the Migration Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by focusing on the eight-week period in which the appellant worked more than 20 hours a week rather than averaging his working hours over the period from his entry into Australia to the delegate's inquiry."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had not shown jurisdictional error by the Migration Review Tribunal; for the reasons given in Islam v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 66, the Tribunal was not required to average the appellant's working hours over the broader period and could focus on the period when he worked more than 20 hours a week in breach of Condition 8104.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The title of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The Migration Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent.' 'The appeal be dismissed.']