Regina v Bulut [2004] NSWCCA 325

Regina v Bulut [2004] NSWCCA 325

The sentencing judge's remarks accurately reflected the gravity of the offences, the need for general deterrence, the aggravating circumstances including planning and callousness, and the applicant's prior criminal record. The subjective factors offered poor counterweight and no error in the sentencing approach or result was demonstrated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'administering Stupefying Drug' 'stealing' 'disposal of Stolen Property']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'administering Stupefying Drug' 'stealing' 'disposal of Stolen Property']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence and Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether undue emphasis was placed on general deterrence in sentencing' "Whether sufficient weight was given to the applicant's subjective factors"]

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge's remarks accurately reflected the gravity of the offences, the need for general deterrence, the aggravating circumstances including planning and callousness, and the applicant's prior criminal record. The subjective factors offered poor counterweight and no error in the sentencing approach or result was demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal be granted.' 'Appeal to be dismissed.']