SBBF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 358

SBBF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 358

The appeal is dismissed because, although apparent errors exist in the Tribunal's reasoning and application of law, such errors are within Tribunal jurisdiction due to s 474(1) Migration Act. There is no evidence of lack of good faith or jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's consideration; the appellant's fears are not for a Convention reason, and the Tribunal's decision stands.

Parties
Appellant: SBBF; Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Federal Court of Australia, Full Court, Appeal From a Single Judge
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Refugee Status, Jurisdictional Error, Convention Grounds for Persecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SBBF

Appellant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Federal Court of Australia, Full Court, Appeal From a Single Judge

  1. 1 Whether the appellant qualifies as a refugee under s 36(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in its reasoning
  3. 3 Whether fears of persecution are Convention-related

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because, although apparent errors exist in the Tribunal's reasoning and application of law, such errors are within Tribunal jurisdiction due to s 474(1) Migration Act. There is no evidence of lack of good faith or jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's consideration; the appellant's fears are not for a Convention reason, and the Tribunal's decision stands.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellant pay to the respondent costs of the appeal.