SBBW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 840

SBBW v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 840

The applicant provided no particulars and identified no error of law or jurisdictional error. The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings about the alleged conversion to Christianity, including reliance on information that the Christianity Certificate was a forgery and on inconsistencies in the applicant's account,...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Writs of Certiorari and Prohibition Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Hearing of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'religious Persecution' 'refugee Review Tribunal']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'religious Persecution' 'refugee Review Tribunal']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Writs of Certiorari and Prohibition Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Hearing of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction in affirming the refusal of a protection visa.' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in law in affirming the refusal of a protection visa.' "Whether any jurisdictional error justified the Federal Court intervening to quash or restrain action on the Tribunal's decision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant provided no particulars and identified no error of law or jurisdictional error. The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings about the alleged conversion to Christianity, including reliance on information that the Christianity Certificate was a forgery and on inconsistencies in the applicant's account, were findings open to it. The accepted incidents of punishment for eating during Ramadan and abuse for being with his girlfriend did not show continuing official interest. Nothing resembling jurisdictional error was apparent, so the Court could not intervene.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The Application be dismissed.' "The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs which costs are to be taxed in default of agreement."]