SBBZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 543
The application was dismissed because nothing in the Tribunal's decision or the material showed an error of law or principle in applying the relevant principles to the facts, and in any event s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) would apply to validate the Tribunal's decision; no matter argued showed failure to comply with the limitations applicable to privative clauses.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Judicial Review After Earlier Remittal to the Tribunal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 474' 'privative Clauses' 'convention Reason' 'illegal Departure' 'conscription' 'internal Relocation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Judicial Review After Earlier Remittal to the Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in affirming the delegate's refusal to grant the applicant a protection visa." 'Whether the applicant faced a real danger of persecution for a Convention reason if returned to Algeria, including by reason of illegal departure, Berber ethnicity, conscription or Islamic extremists.' "Whether s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied to validate the Tribunal's decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because nothing in the Tribunal's decision or the material showed an error of law or principle in applying the relevant principles to the facts, and in any event s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) would apply to validate the Tribunal's decision; no matter argued showed failure to comply with the limitations applicable to privative clauses.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant to pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment