SBGC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 24
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant made no submissions supporting her grounds, the grounds did not identify any error by the primary judge, and there was no material before the primary judge or the Full Court showing that the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision was infected with jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the primary judge erred in dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision." 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal decision was infected with jurisdictional error.' "Whether the appellant identified any error in the primary judge's reasons or decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant made no submissions supporting her grounds, the grounds did not identify any error by the primary judge, and there was no material before the primary judge or the Full Court showing that the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision was infected with jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment